Skip to content
Illustration for Talent Crisis Communication: What Brands Get Wrong
Source: Ad Age

Talent Crisis Communication: What Brands Get Wrong

Eamon Blackthorn
By Eamon Blackthorn Author of the best-selling book Say It Right Every Time
3 min read Crisis & Reputation
Listen to Story BETA

What Happened

Brands are increasingly getting caught flat-footed when spokespeople, influencers, or creative partners blow up publicly. The industry is now circulating crisis playbooks covering everything from vetting talent before signing to managing reputation damage after a partnership goes sideways. The conversation has shifted from "how do we respond" to "how do we never need to respond in the first place."

The Communication Angle

Here is the hard truth most brands refuse to accept: the crisis communication problem usually starts six months before anyone is on camera apologizing. By the time a brand is in damage-control mode, they have already lost. The real communication failure happened during the vetting stage, when nobody asked the uncomfortable questions out loud.

Vetting is a communication act. It requires someone in the room to say, directly and without softening it: "What is the worst thing about this person that we might find out later?" Most brand teams skip this conversation because it feels awkward. They mistake discomfort for inappropriateness. Those are not the same thing. Discomfort is just resistance to a necessary conversation. Inappropriateness is actually crossing a line. Conflating the two costs brands millions.

When a talent crisis does hit, the brands that survive it share one communication habit: they speak first, they speak specifically, and they do not pretend the relationship was smaller than it was. Vague distancing statements like "we are reviewing the situation" are the worst possible move. They signal that you know something is wrong and you are stalling. Your audience reads that correctly every single time. Specificity is credibility. Say what you know, say what you are doing, and say when you will say more.

The recovery phase is where most brands compound the original damage. They issue a statement, go quiet, and assume the story dies. It rarely does. Recovery requires a second communication moment: a follow-through statement that shows you actually did what you said you would do. Without that close, your first statement looks like a performance. With it, the story has an ending and audiences can move on.

The brands that handle this well treat crisis communication not as a PR function but as a leadership function. The voice that comes out matters as much as the words. A statement released through a spokesperson carries a fraction of the weight of a statement delivered by someone with actual authority who is willing to put their name on a position.

This is exactly the kind of scenario I break down in Say It Right Every Time. The chapter on high-stakes conversations gives you a framework for asking the questions that feel dangerous but are actually just necessary. Most people confuse a hard question with an aggressive one. That confusion is what leaves brands speechless when the cameras show up uninvited.

Say It Right Every Time by Eamon Blackthorn

Never Be Lost
for Words Again

By Eamon Blackthorn

Get word‑for‑word scripts for the conversations that shape your life, from job interviews and negotiations to difficult talks with family and partners, so you always know exactly what to say and how to say it.

Go to Book PageFrom $9.97 USD
PaperbackHardcoverKindleAudiobook
Say It Right Every Time by Eamon Blackthorn

Never Be Lost
for Words Again

By Eamon Blackthorn

Get word‑for‑word scripts for the conversations that shape your life, from job interviews and negotiations to difficult talks with family and partners, so you always know exactly what to say and how to say it.

Go to Book PageFrom $9.97 USD
PaperbackHardcoverKindleAudiobook

Key Takeaway

Before you sign any talent partnership, schedule a 20-minute "worst case" meeting with your team. Write this exact question on the whiteboard: "If this person becomes a liability in 12 months, what is our prepared public response?" If you cannot draft a coherent answer in that room, you are not ready to sign. This forces the vetting conversation that most teams avoid and gives you a crisis framework before you need one.

More in Crisis & Reputation

Illustration for Hull City Owner's Public Spat: A Communication Failure
Crisis & Reputation

Hull City Owner's Public Spat: A Communication Failure

Hull City owner Acun Ilicali and the head of Polish club Pogoń Szczecin have traded increasingly sharp public statements over a sporting director both clubs apparently want. What started as a personnel dispute has become a full-blown reputational skirmish, playing out in front of fans, press, and potential future partners. Neither side appears to have a plan for how this ends.

Illustration for Why Boards Now Require Communication Rehearsal
Crisis & Reputation

Why Boards Now Require Communication Rehearsal

Corporate boards are now treating communication rehearsal as a formal risk management tool, not a soft-skills afterthought. Companies are building structured practice sessions into their preparation for earnings calls, crisis announcements, mergers, and regulatory hearings. The shift reflects a growing recognition that how leadership speaks during high-stakes moments can move markets, destroy reputations, or save companies just as surely as any financial decision.

Illustration for Why Boards Are Mandating Communication Rehearsal
Crisis & Reputation

Why Boards Are Mandating Communication Rehearsal

Corporate boards are no longer treating communication as a soft skill left to the communications department. A growing number of governance bodies are now requiring executives to rehearse their messaging before major corporate events, from earnings calls to merger announcements to crisis responses. This shift positions communication preparation not as polish, but as a formal risk management discipline sitting alongside legal and financial controls.

Illustration for Why Brands Fail on Social Media (And How to Fix It)
Crisis & Reputation

Why Brands Fail on Social Media (And How to Fix It)

Social media has handed brands a direct line to millions of people, and many of them are using it to accidentally destroy their own reputations. Across industries, companies have posted tone-deaf responses to crises, doubled down on bad takes, or gone silent at exactly the wrong moment. The pattern is consistent: brands treat social media like a megaphone when it actually functions as a two-way conversation.

Illustration for Talent Crisis Communication: What Brands Get Wrong

Enjoyed this article?

Talent Crisis Communication: What Brands Get Wrong

Brands are increasingly getting caught flat-footed when spokespeople, influencers, or creative partners blow up publicly. The industry is now circulating crisis playbooks covering everything from vetting talent before signing to managing reputation damage after a partnership goes sideways. The conversation has shifted from "how do we respond" to "how do we never need to respond in the first place."

Share it with someone who needs to hear this.

Share